New downloads are the problem and even then, it can be avoided, people can easily submit most files to websites like virustotal and see what it says, without having to have a software check all files when 9.9999999999999999999999999999% of files are not malicious of the existing files that anyone can have in a computer. In fact, running an antivirus or antimalware or whatever 24/7 in Windows is stupid, the article actually proves that because moving files and doing stuff like that get affected by software checking them to see if they are malicious like if magically the file will become malicious after being in a disk for 10 years. You mean the PC Operating System that is so irrelevant for anyone so they don’t get many malware targeted at them because they are unimportant?Īt least you show how clueless you are because there have been malware targeted at linux, there have been even Universities submit bad code to prove how there is not even a code review when they accept changes, plus we can also include the vulnerabilities in IOT and other devices that are Linux based. Now You: which security software do you use on your devices? Microsoft Defender did not do well in AV-Comparatives offline scanning capabilities test either. A comparison with other low-powered systems might have given a clearer picture of the performance impact. Faster systems may see less of a performance impact when these activities and operations are run. Tests were run on a single low-powered system and results may differ on other systems. The benchmark test result places it in the middle of the tested applications. It did not perform well in two of the test categories and that resulted in it having a large impact on system performance while these specific tasks were performed on the test system. Microsoft Defender placed second to last in the test. All other products got "fast" or "very fast" ratings in the test. Microsoft's security product got a "mediocre" rating in the installing applications test, which it shared with Total Defense. It performed better in subsequent runs, getting a "very fast" rating in that test category. While Microsoft Defender did get several "very fast" ratings, in launching applications, browsing websites and downloading files, it received the worst score, "slow", in the first run file copying test. It ranked second to last in the test, only Total Defense had a higher impact on system performance than Microsoft's product. Microsoft Defender did not perform well in the tests. ESET, G Data and Panda had a single "fast" rating while all others were considered "very fast". Only one antivirus solution, K7, got the very fast rating in all test categories. The four ratings reveal how much better or worse a product did in comparison to the other tested programs. The ranking system awarded slow, mediocre, fast and very fast rating for each of the products in all test categories. Additionally, the researchers ran benchmark tests in PC Mark 10 Professional to measure the system impact during real-world usage. The tests included common operations and activities on the device, including file copying, archiving and extracting operations, the installation or uninstallation of applications, the browsing of sites, and launching applications. The device was powered by an Intel Core i3 processor, 4 Gigabytes of memory and Solid State Drive hard disks. The company ran a number of tests on a fully patched Windows 10 version 21H2 device.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |